It is common opinion that the House of Rothschild rules
the world invisibly today, and has done so for two centuries, by creating (i.e.
paying off) its own puppets to work on its behalf in the visible world...on many
fronts but especially in politics, commerce, technology, education and media
outlets. The first Rothschild originated in a part of Germany where rulers were
"illuminated" with the so-called "Age of Enlightenment" brought on by
Rosicrucians...and by "first" I mean that "Rothschild" was not the true family
name; internet websites say that it was "Bauer," meaning "farmer." The
Enlightenment has given the world modern democratic politics, the industrial
revolution, highly-advanced science and technology, overwhelming knowledge,
awesome communication possibilities, but all topped off with grief, plagues,
horrors, evil and certain self-destruction because the Creator has either been
eradicated from mainstream life, or pushed into corners of society and there
degraded into a variety of persons or "somethings" that He is not.
Mayer Bauer changed the name to "Rothschild" (meaning "red shield") for a
reason not generally known. Yes, he had hung a red-shield sign/symbol above the
door of his shop while still a poor/common family man, but what did it mean?
Apparently, the protection and/or advancement of something red...and I don't
think it had anything to do with red potatoes. Probably a red people. It just so
happens that he was an Ashkenazi Jew, and that Ashkenaz was a region in Magog
where the so-called "red Jews" of Khazaria had ruled an empire on the north
shores of the Black and Caspian seas. Several voices are now proclaiming that
the Rothschilds, and most other Ashkenazi Jews, are descended from the Khazars.
While the Jews of Khazaria had been the small minority among both Christian
and Muslim citizens, they ruled the empire absolutely; it had been the law of
the land that only Jews could rule! There were two kings, an invisible one
called a "khagan," and a visible one called a "beg." Interesting, isn't it, that
the invisible Rothschilds are now a few Jews ruling the world.
In 867 AD, Vikings from Scandanavia, who called themselves "Varangian Rus,"
appeared near Kiev (north shore of the Black Sea), and eventually took the city
from the Khazars. For some years the invaders lived side by side with the
Khazars, but thereafter they put the Khazars to flight, at roughly which time
the phrase, "Ashkenazi Jew," was heard for the first time in the regions of
Germany and Hungary. Arthur Koestler and some other researchers believe that the
ruling Khazars were not true Hebrews, but instead Turks who had converted to
Judaism. For this reason, Koestler and others suggest that the Ashkenazi
Jews--over 90 percent of those who claim to be Jews today--are Turks who wrongly
believe to be Jews. If Koestler is correct, then the conspiracy to control the
world by international bankers is not a Jewish plot, but a Turkish plot. Or,
Hitler sent mainly Turks to concentration camps! And Turks now run the State of
Israel!!
I disagree. As Koestler himself acknowledges, there were some true Hebrews in
Khazaria. Moreover, Ezekiel 38:8 speaks on the 1948 re-occupation of Israel by
the "house of Israel" (Ezekiel 39:23). And there are scores of prophecies
elsewhere concerning the years just prior to Armageddon in which the eternal
restoration of Israel is the subject, and where the peoples involved are
unmistakably identified as the bloodline of Jacob.
Koestler tells of a certain Khazar king named "Joseph," who, although
suspected of being a Hebrew by the Jews of western Europe, claimed otherwise in
a letter to them...claiming that his fathers were descended from the seventh son
of Togarmah, named "Khazar." Now Togarmah was a son of Gomer, and Gomer was a
son of Japheth (i.e. not Shem), wherefore it is impossible for the Judaic rulers
of Khazaria to have been Hebrews by blood if they were descended from Togarmah.
Koestler and others should perhaps entertain the possibility that Joseph might
have been lying to the European Jews in order to protect himself, and all other
Khazar Jews, from the sort of Vatican persecution that the European Jews had
been under, and would again and again be inflicted with.
Note that after the second Vatican Crusade against Jerusalem (1147-49), which
was a Templar-led flop, some Jews of Khazaria organized a Zionist movement of
their own which also involved a siege of Jerusalem (that never happened). Arthur
Koestler puts in this way:
"In the twelfth century there arose in Khazaria
a Messianic movement, a rudimentary attempt at a Jewish crusade, aimed at the
conquest of Palestine by force of arms. The initiator of the movement was a
Khazar Jew, one Solomon ben Duji (or Ruhi or Roy), aided by his son Menahem and
a Palestinian scribe. 'They wrote letters to all the Jews, near and far, in all
the lands around them...They said that the time had come in which God would
gather Israel, His people from all lands to Jerusalem, the holy city, and that
Solomon Ben Duji was Elijah, and his son the Messiah'"
(http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/13trib04.htm)
Clearly, this Khazar-Jew Zionism was an attempt to set the stage for the
Biblical Millennium (would Turks have gone to these lengths?). I have sought any
evidence whatsoever to show whether or not Solomon ben Duji had been connected
to the Templars/Crusaders and their brand of Zionism. I can find nothing either
way, even though his twelfth-century thrust coincided with the second and/or
third Crusades. What seems certain is that Khazar Zionism was the very task
picked up centuries later by the Bauers, who, as the House of Rothschild, would
eventually succeed in creating an official Jewish nation around Jerusalem, but
not until 1948.
Note that, in Ezekiel 38:8, God does not take credit for the 1948
re-instatement of Jews in the land of Israel, because, in my opinion, God merely
had to withdraw His hand, at the appointed time, to allow his Jewish enemies to
succeed in their flesh-powered brand of Zionism. These Jews were not relying on
God, nor waiting on Him, but were bankers, lovers of money, and desirous of
grand political power. Mayer Rothschild (the first Rothschild) was himself a
banker who had wormed his way into the affairs of one of the wealthiest men of
Europe, prince William of Hesse-Hanau. William's brother (Karl) was a leader in
European Freemasonry.
Almost certainly, as is claimed by others, the Bavarian Illuminati grew out
of the Enlightenment movement...and because the Rothschilds were overseers of
the Bavarian Illuminati, its outgrowth became the Rothschild Illuminati as per
the Rothschild rags-to-riches events. This is an important point, for the
Rothschild Illuminati, being a Jew-based organization, could not be an integral
part of the Rosicrucian Ros(e) Line if that Line was Aryan/Norse. In fact, we'd
expect the two Illuminati to be in mortal conflict, and indeed we do see them at
war in the 20th century wherein the Nazis--who were an "Aryan" branch of
Theosophist Rosicrucians, and were moreover supported by the Hesse royal
family--were persecuting the Rothschilds internationally.
On the one hand, the Rosicrucians are those whom I feel wish to place a
Rose-Line member on the future throne of the world, while on the other hand one
can expect the modern Rothschilds to be seeking a certain Rothschild for the
world throne (keep in mind that not all Rothschilds are known by that name).
Where the Rothschilds formed alliances with Rosicrucians, the Rothschilds
desire(d) a Jewish-controlled Palestine at the helm of the New World, while the
pro-Rothschilds Rosicrucians want(ed) Britain and/or America to act as the "New
Israel." It is a testimony to the partnerships developed by these two groups, I
think, that the Rothschilds came to respect and perhaps embrace the Anglo-based
"Israel" while the Rosicrucians came to tolerate, if not support, Zionism.
Because I concluded from my personal analysis of Revelation 13 that the False
Prophet will be an American leader, I tend to expect the False Prophet to come
from the Rosicrucian camp rather than the Rothschild camp. Yet who knows but
that the two horns which symbolize the False Prophet may not prove to be a union
between American and British Rosicrucians, or perhaps a union between the
Rosicrucians and the Rothschilds.
No sooner after the French Revolution had the House of Rothschild become the
wealthiest family in Europe that, in 1822, the hexagram (six-pointed star) was
incorporated upon the Rothschild coat of arms, the same star that is sported by
the modern Rosicrucians and the State of Israel! It is believed by some
researchers that this "Star of David" (also called "Shield of David" and "Seal
of Solomon") was not a symbol relating to either the Biblical King David or
Solomon, but to Solomon ben Duji the Khazar, and his son, David al-Roy. Read
this from Arthur Koestler:
"David al-Roy was assassinated - apparently in
his sleep, allegedly by his own father-in-law...But the cult did not stop there.
According to one theory, the six-pointed "shield of David," which adorns the
modern Israeli flag, started to become a national symbol with David al-Roy's
crusade. 'Ever since,' writes Baron, 'it has been suggested, the six-cornered
"shield of David", theretofore mainly a decorative motif or a magical emblem,
began its career toward becoming the chief national-religious symbol of
Judaism...it was attributed to David in mystic and ethical German writings from
the thirteenth century on, and appeared on the Jewish flag in Prague in 1527.'
Baron appends a qualifying note to this passage, pointing out that the
connection between al-Roy and the six-pointed star still awaits further
elucidation and proof."
I'm convinced! And as the hexagram was called the "Shield of David," we may
suspect that it had everything to do with Mayer Bauer naming himself "Red
Shield"? Even prior to the birth of Mayer, the Shield-of-David star was in fact
red when used as a logo by Jewish printers in Prague (as early as the 15th
century).
The modern Israeli equivalent to the International Red Cross is called "Red
Shield of David, UK" (Hebrew: "Magen David Adom, UK"), and was initially founded
in "a shop on the corner of Rothschild and Nahalat Benyamin
Streets [Tel Aviv 1930]" (http://www.ukmda.org/history.html). The
organization, as can be deduced by the "UK" in its name, was founded in
Britain...surely the British Rothschilds had everything to do with this
organization's inception...to have certain controls over the blood supply of
Israel, perhaps?
The Magen David website tells us that the hexagram "was
used by Jews for decoration and appeared as an official Jewish symbol for the
first time in 1354 when the Jewish community in Prague [Germany] received the
right to have a flag of its own and chose the Shield of David..."
"Decoration" my foot. It was a symbol used to spur or maintain the ideals of
Zionism and/or Israelite Millennialism in the minds of Ashkenazi Jews. Because
the House of Rothschild has ultimately brought the State of Israel into
existence, we could view the Israeli flag today as a Rothschild flag, even a
Khazar flag...and possibly a Rosicrucian flag.
How do the Rosicrucians and the Rothschilds both use the hexagram as their
symbols? The theory is that a certain Richard Bauer had found a means to convert
lead or mercury to gold in the process of alchemy. Whether this fantastic
discovery is true or not is not the point, but rather that this Bauer was likely
an early Rosicrucian because Rosicrucians would thereafter come to have alchemy
as one of their main insignia. The other point is that the Rothschilds had been
Bauers so that if per chance Richard Bauer was an ancestor of the Rothschilds,
then the Rothschilds stem from Jewish Rosicrucians. That would explain the
Kabala being yet another Rosicrucian insignia in some Rosicrucian circles. Later
we will see that the Khazars (i.e. the non-Jews) were themselves Aryans so that
a Jewish-Aryan partnership was the result when the Jews came to rule over
Khazaria.
Could the essence of early Rosicrucianism have been a Jewish-Aryan alliance?
That is, an alliance between Marano Jews (also called "neo-Christians") and
Aryans? The Maranos were persecuted violently by the Inquisition, after all, and
the anti-Vatican position of the Rosicrucians could thereby be partially
explained. Many Aryan peoples had been a sort of Marano people too, as they had
"converted" to Catholicism, not sincerely, but by force of Vatican armies. For
an excellent example of a Jewish-Anglo partnership involving the Rothschilds,
note that the first Rothschild, Mayer, "was appointed
financial agent of the British government during the French revolutionary wars"
(http://encarta.msn.com/text_761576222__1/Rothschild_House_of.html).
The Marano Jews were set free from Vatican persecution as a direct result of
the French Revolution, and one wonders if this war wasn't waged by the
Rothschild Illuminati for that very reason. The Rothschilds became the head of
these Jews thereafter. For example, during the Revolution, the Consistoire
Central of French Israelis was formed (1791) to represent and advance Jewish
issues, with French Rothschilds acting as Presidents for multiple generations.
At Edinburgh (very near Roslin) there was built the palace, Holyrood House,
which may mean, "House of the Haly Red" (early records read as "Halyrod," not
"Holyrood"). The official line is that "Holyrood" means "holy rod" and refers to
the cross of Christ. In what sounds like a tale, it is said that Margaret
brought from Hungary to Scotland a piece of the actual cross of Christ; that
sounds like a typical cover up to keep Christian rulers happily unsuspecting of
a reality. As "rood" means "red" in Dutch, and also because it's similar to
"rud," where "ruddy" refers to a red tinge, perhaps "Holyrood House" refers to a
red entity, or even a red bloodline.
The Russell (also meaning "red") clan of Scotland was originally a Jewish
family from Germany, known then as the "Roesels," alternatively "Rosel" and
"Rossel." One can hardly fail to see the "Rus" in "Russell" or the "Ros" in
"Rosel," evoking the proto-Russians. But knowing that "el" means "God" in
Hebrew, the name seems to mean either "the Ros of God" or "the Red of God." Then
again, perhaps it means the "Red God." It's so very interesting that a great
leader of the Varangian Rus, Vladimir I, conquered a red land (Galicia), that
came to be known as "Red Rus," and that he was called "Vladimir the Red Sun."
That's equivalent to calling him the "Red God." But the Varangians were Aryans,
if not Anglo-Aryans ("Varangian" could mean "Warring Anglos" because "var" means
"war"), and that doesn't fit a red bloodline. But as "hali" means "salt,"
perhaps "Halyrod" refers to a white bloodline.
When I first began to suspect the Russell bloodline as having some
significance in the Rose-Line cult, I did not know that the Skull and Bones club
in the United States was incorporated as the Russell Trust Fund (1856). But in
that case, what others are saying, that a certain Russell family is one of the
top thirteen Illuminati families today, may just be true.
I suspect that pastor Charles Russell, founder of the Zion Tract Society (and
root of the Jehovah's-Witnesses cult), had been working more closely with the
British Rothschilds than the world was supposed to know. He worked openly in
support of Zionism when the British and French Rothschilds were spearheading the
re-settlement of Jews in the Holy Land. He was quite successful in motivating
Jews to resettle because he did not attempt to convert them to Christ...a
strategy that the Rothschilds would have favored. In 1914, as his part in
Rothschild Zionism, Russell announced that God would bless all Jews who would
thenceforth return to the Holy Land.
It is too difficult for me to see as a coincidence Russell's prediction of
Armageddon and the return of Jesus for 1914, the very year that turned out to be
the first of World War I, as though Russell knew it beforehand. Britannica put
it this way: From 1877 he preached that Christ's second
advent would be invisible, that the end of the Gentile times would come in 1914,
followed by war between capitalism and communism or socialism, after which God's
Kingdom by Christ would rule the whole earth" (1970; Vol. 19, page 770).
While the phrase above, "communism or socialism," would seem to refer to
Communist Russia, that entity was not yet born when Russell was making the
prediction. Because the Rothschilds, from the 1880s onwards, were bringing the
socialist Fabian societies to fruition, the Americans were perhaps supposed to
have lost the war for the Allies so that, after the War, Russia under the Fabian
societies could arise as world rulers. Frightening thought.
Because the Rothschilds are implicated in the installation into power in
Russia of the so-called "Red Jews," during the War (1917), and also due to the
fact that a global government (i.e. the League of Nations) was being desperately
sought by the Rothschilds, using the War as a reason for its need, I and many
others suspect strongly that the international Rothschilds started the War
itself, and manipulated the events toward their goals as much as they could. A
study of that War, with the end-goal of conquering Russia in mind, brings out
the following conclusions: that the German Rothschilds fomented the war for a
generation previous to 1914 through German media outlets; that the English
Rothschilds, in support of the German Rothschilds, permitted only as many
English soldiers onto the Belgium-French scene as were needed to check/stalemate
the German advance into France but not to defeat it until the Germans had
defeated Russia; that the English Rothschilds through their agents Woodrow
Wilson and his ambassador, Edward House, kept the Americans out of the war until
(April 1917) after the Bolsheviks had seized the Russian reigns of rule by a
coup (Mar. 1917); that the Germans, even though they had defeated the Russian
military by the autumn of 1917, and therefore should have, and could have, taken
the country, instead decided on a peace treaty (Dec. 1917) with the Rothschild
agents (i.e. the Bolsheviks) then in power; and that German Rothschilds together
with the British Rothschilds began putting an end to the war immediately after
the peace treaty by setting German public opinion against war on the one hand,
and on the other hand by suddenly turning the western Allies, until then a lame
lot, into a powerhouse that easily repelled the Germans into a steady retreat
until they gave up in defeat (late 1918).
Now the English were a lame lot for the first three years and more of the
War; Britannica says that they could have halted the German advance quickly in
the Belgium-French arena had they come out all at once with most of their
forces, and yet they came in dribs and drabs. Therefore, there was a stalemate
on that front for three years that meanwhile permitted the Germans to the east
of it to work their will on Russia. But while the English appeared as though
they couldn't afford men in Belgium or France, how is it that they had men to
spare for the purpose of conquering both Jerusalem and Babylon, including
Baghdad? It's clear in my mind that the Middle East was as much the Rothschild
target as was Russia, for the two went hand in hand in their global-government
scheme.
Behold, in November of 1917, as the Russian Rothschilds were on the verge of
signing a peace treaty with the Germans, the British Foreign Secretary, a Fabian
co-conspirator, and occult-loving buddy of the Rothschilds, Arthur Balfour,
writes a letter to Lord Lionel Rothschild asking him to accept his Declaration
wherein the Jews could be re-instated into their ancient homeland. In the very
next month, the English conquer Jerusalem. Then, just after the War, the
Rothschilds set up a Foreign Affairs office in Britain and in the United States,
with more to come in other nations, and filled them with Illuminatists under
their care and watch...having the job of ratcheting the governments of the world
into submission to the Rothschild plan for Globalism. So, you see, the
restoration of the Jews to the Holy Land is part and parcel with the
establishment of the Rothschild New World Order...because that New Order is
intended to be the Biblical Millennium as per a Jewish-occult vision.
Winston Churchill was lord of the British admiralty when the first World War
started. Just days before the War began, he, "on his own
responsibility, ordered the naval mobilizations which guaranteed complete
readiness when war was declared," and, "In Oct. 1914,
when Antwerp was falling, he characteristically rushed in person to organize its
defense..." (Britannica, 1970, Vol. 5, page 748). This zeal on behalf of
Britain and against the Germans was not conducive to the will of the
Rothschilds, wherefore, behold, Churchill was soon replaced as lord of the
admiralty (May 1915) by the good buddy of the Rothschilds, Arthur Balfour! So,
you see, the Rothschilds had not a few political puppets in the Parliament to
make things work their way.
It seems that the entire 1914-scheme started rolling its wheels in the 1880s,
for it was at about that time also that the Rothschilds began to settle Russian
Jews into the Holy Land. And see here what the American Hebrew Magazine said
just after the War:
"The Bolshevist revolution in Russia was the
work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal
is to create a new order of the world" (Sept. 10, 1920)
Many other Jewish and non-Jewish sources agreed. In the same year (1920),
Winston Churchill wrote the following in the Illustrated Sunday Herald:
"From the days of SPARTICUS (Adam Weishaupt) to
Karl Marx, to those of Trotsky, Bela-Kuhn, Rose Luxembourg, and Emma Goldman,
this [Jewish/Rothschild] world-wide conspiracy has been STEADILY growing. This
conspiracy has played a definitively recognizable role in the tragedy of the
French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement
during the 19th century; and now at last, this band of extraordinary
personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have
gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads, and have become
practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire"
(Quoted
from The Missing Dimension in World Affairs, Goy, p. 92).
Clearly, Churchill was, at least initially, opposed to the Rothschild
Illuminati. In the above list of Jewish names, we see Adam Weishaupt, the
official founder of the Bavarian Illuminati (1776) while under the oversight of
Mayer Rothschild. Modern socialism was evident in the mind of Weishaupt, and who
knows but that it was perhaps patterned after Jewish-ruled Khazaria. We find
Weishaupt's socialism a generation after him in another German Jew, Karl Marx,
who, as an apostate, became as Satanic as was Weishaupt. Marx, too, was financed
by the Rothschilds.
From his training in France and England, Marx developed his "personal"
Communistic ideals and wrote the Communist Manifesto, although we can estimate
quite rightly that these ideas, in reality based on dictatorial rule that no one
wanted, were "refined" for public dissemination. The following letter by
Baruch Levy, to Marx, reflects Weishaupt's dictatorial socialism in a Zionistic
format:
"The Jewish people as a whole will be its own
Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the
abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and by the establishment
of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of
citizenship. In this "new world order" the children of Israel will furnish all
the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different
peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands
of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private
property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will
the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic
time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their
hands" (from `La Revue de Paris', p. 574, June 1, 1928,
http://beta.communities.msn.ca/UndergroundOracleII).
But let's go back prior to Marx, and prior even to the Bavarian Illuminati,
to see the deeper root of this movement. Frederick II, king of Prussia (died
1786), while confessing Catholicism publicly, was an atheist to his close
associates, and moreover was a so-called "Illuminated Despot," meaning that he
ruled by Age-of-Enlightenment philosophies that had flowed from Rosicrucian
movements. Britannica says that "He made the Prussia of his
day a model state of 'enlightenment despotism'" (1970: Vol. 9; page 831).
The object of this form of government was, not to benefit the peoples' lot in
life; as is often claimed in an effort to honor the movement, but to better the
people's lot in life so that they could raise more money and thereby provide
more taxes. It's the same system that we live under to this day: capitalism.
Frederick was a friend of Voltaire, the principal leader of the
Enlightenment, who himself promoted Illuminated Despotism in France, and whose
goal it was to undermine the powers of monarchs and Christianity. Frederick was
influenced by Voltaire when the latter lived in Prussia (1751) at Frederick's
invitation. It should also be said that Voltaire was staying in Frankfurt in
1753, where he was arrested by Frederick. Mayer, who lived in Frankfurt, was
just nine years old at the time, but, the question is, what effect did Voltaire
have on the Jews of Frankfurt that Mayer could later pick up and run with?
Indeed, it's a good question, for it is said by some that the Bavarian
Illuminati copied from Voltaire. That seems likely, as the principles of
Enlightened Despotism--representative government, liberalism, humanism,
toleration of religion, and freedom of the press--were the same principles
forced upon France by the Bavarian/Rothschild Illuminati during the French
Revolution (1789 and onward)...and are obviously the very principles in our
midst today in most of the Western world. I would venture to say that these
principles represent the backbone of Mystery Babylon (the so-called "Harlot" of
Revelation 17). At the website of the "Voltaire Society of America," we
read:
The chief purpose of THE VOLTAIRE SOCIETY OF
AMERICA INCORPORATED is to foster the spirit of the Enlightenment, tolerance and
respect for the rights of the individual as exemplified by the life of Voltaire
and as reflected in the beliefs of his contemporaries, the founders of the
United States.
Our projects now include the presentation of lectures and the creation of
educational materials such as a video on Voltaire and Jefferson...
(http://humanities.uchicago.edu/homes/VSA/)
That's Thomas Jefferson that is being placed side-by-side with Voltaire,
and I've read that Jefferson was a supporter of Adam Weishaupt. It is no
secret that the principles that were established in France under the Illuminati
fist were virtually the self-same that found establishment in the United
States.
I found an interesting Christian personality on an internet site, with no name provided. While answering questions, he answered thus: "Well, you are talking to an Ex-Illuminatist who knows that there
is no such thing [as the Communist party being the greatest threat in the
world]! Anybody coming out of the Illuminati will tell you that the Communist
Party is run by Illuminatists. NOT COMMUNISTS!!!...Now if you go to the British
Museum you will find two checks for several thousand pounds made out to Carl
Marx, and signed by Nathan Rothschild!"
I don't know if this ex-Illuminatist is a post-tribber, but, to the question,
"what are Christians expected to do?", he did say the following:
"Pray! I'll tell you this. The only thing the
Illuminati fears as I said is an independent person who can live, eat, sleep,
stay warm and defend themselves separate from Federal help. Pray that the Lord
gives us more time! It is short (close)! See, they have tried twice before. They
have never been this organized. They have tried twice before in a span of 200
years to RULE the WORLD and came VERY CLOSE! Once during Napoleon and once
during WW 1. They came EXTREMELY close to gaining the world both times!"
(http://www.textfiles.com/occult/jtc4.txt)
If I might use one
of my Lord's favorite lines, "Those who have ears, let them hear."
Because some members of Charles Russell's family had been proclaiming him to be someone very special in the eyes of God, chosen from birth, who knows but that this is indication that Illuminatists had been planning to use a Russell at the helm of their New World Order. Russell had denounced all denominations but his own, and had called his organization "International Bible Students Association," as though anticipating a global teaching career in which he
would become renown as the spiritual giant of the world. In fact, he claimed to
be an angel in the book of Revelation. Charles was a nutty pyramidologist, and a
Freemason, if that tells you how qualified he was to be an Illuminatist.
The following quotes begin to show that the Rossels were in Britain in
the early Templar period, and that they were associated with the Normans,
as had been the Templars/Crusaders:
The surname "Russell" began to appear in Irish
records after the Anglo-Norman invasion [1066] and is now numerous in Ulster and
Leinster. It is derived from an old French word denoting a red-haired person and
is also an anglicized form of the French Protestant surname, Rossel
(http://russell.family-history.com/OriginofSurname.htm).
I don't take the "red-hair" meaning of "Russell" too seriously, and the French origin of the name is in dispute against an alternative Norman view:
[Russell] is probably derived from "rous"
meaning red and early bearers of the name no doubt had red hair - and were
probably of Norman or French extraction. While the name is by no means confined
to Scotland, it is within the top 50 most frequently found names in the
country...The name is one of the earliest surnames recorded in Scotland, the
first being a Walter Russell who witnessed a charter in Paisley Abbey some time
between 1164 and 1177" (http://www.rampantscotland.com/clans/blclanrussell.htm).
After recognizing the distinct possibility of modern Russells having an
important Illuminati role, I was shocked upon learning that one of the
original nine Templars was named, "Rossal." And behold, for years,
the Chairman of the Rosslyn Chapel Restoration Committee has been an Andrew
Russell. Coincidence? Or might "Roslin" itself have been named
after the Rossals?
The Templar known by the name of "Rossal" may very well have
come to Scotland with Hugh de Payen (1128), for I read in some cases that
all nine Templars returned west, from Jerusalem, when Hugh returned. In
fact, Rossal may have been from Scotland in the first place, for, as early
as the 1200s, there was in northwest Scotland (i.e. in the Highlands) the
village of Rossal.
There was both a Ross clan and a Rose clan in early Scotland. Therefore,
either the Rossels/Rossals could have been related to either one. The Ross
and Rose clans were also in the Highlands; "Rose" is pronounced
"Ross."
In the next few chapters, I will go a long route to show that the Rosicrucians descend from the Roxolani, where the "Rox" is a variation of "Ros," and where the suffix, "olani," refers to the Alan Huns, a peoples descended from the Biblical Gogi. In other words, the Roxolani were a mix of Rosh and Gogi blood. It was only after coming to this conclusion that I noticed the similarity between "Roxolani" (alternative "Ros-Alani") and "Roslin," especially "Rosalin." Thus, while "Rose Line" may be derived from "Roslin," the latter may be derived from the Roxolani.
It must be said that the Stewarts, or Stuarts, who provided many British
kings, now wish to place a Stewart descendant at the head of the European
Union. In fact, the controversial book, Bloodline of the Holy Grail, in
which we find the theory of the Rose Line, promotes this modern Stewart
quest to rule. The question is, how do the Stewarts have anything to do
with the Rose Line?
My story in the next few chapters also touches on the Drummonds and other
Highland clans who vehemently supported the Stuart kings. Moreover, you
will see that the Drummonds are related by blood to the Rosses in a way
that you could never guess, and you will be invited to consider that "Ross"
is not a proper name, even as "Stewart" is not a proper name,
but that "Ross" was devised to represent the Ros(e) Line of the
Drummonds. Because "Stewart" was devised from "steward,"
the Stewarts may have been the stewards of the Ros(e) Line.
Walter fitz Alan's descendant, another Walter, married the daughter of Robert Bruce I, and together they had a daughter who married Robert II. Thus, Robert II was the first Stewart king. The Robert Bruces (there were several of them prior to Robert I) not only served the Norman and Viking rulers, but had married St. Clairs and were thereby descendants of the Rollo Vikings. It's not too hard to spot the "Rus" in Brus, Brussi, or Brusse, the proper spellings of "Bruce," but this is not to say that there is definitely a connection.
It's interesting that Alan fitz Flaald, the father of Walter fitz Alan
(above), was Seneschal of the archbishop of Dol in Brittany (his ancestors
were Seneschals to the counts of Dol). "Seneschal" means "High
Protector," and is synonymous with "High Steward." What
on earth was that family protecting and managing in Brittany (modern France)
prior to doing the same in the Scottish royal courts? Did it have anything
to do with protecting a bloodline in Brittany. I note that the brother
of Alan fitz Flaald, also Alan, went on the first Crusade to Jerusalem.
There are those who would want you to believe that the Stewarts descend
from the Merovingians, the Fisher kings...and all the way back to Jesus
and his mistress. Obviously, this little tale was fabricated to hide the
real roots of the Seneschals.
The Ross clan was early "de Ros," and, prior to being in the Highlands, the family was situated on the west coast of Scotland due west of Roslin, in Ayrshire. The Stewarts were right next door. But so were the Drummonds, at Drymen!! [Update July 20006 -- I had traced the Druids to the mythical Dryas.] The Rose clan was also there, in submission to the Rosses. When the Rosses moved north to Ross-Shire, they lived in the midst of the Roses there, and mingled blood. It was discovered that the Roses had similarities to the Roos family in England, and of course "Roos" evokes "Rus."
HOME TO THE BOOK
NEXT CHAPTER Henry Drummond the Hun
|
(私論．私見)
