It is common opinion that the House of
Rothschild rules the world invisibly today, and has done so for two centuries,
by creating (i.e. paying off) its own puppets to work on its behalf in the
visible world...on many fronts but especially in politics, commerce, technology,
education and media outlets. The first Rothschild originated in a part of
Germany where rulers were "illuminated" with the so-called "Age of
Enlightenment" brought on by Rosicrucians...and by "first" I mean that
"Rothschild" was not the true family name; internet websites say that it was
"Bauer," meaning "farmer." The Enlightenment has given the world modern
democratic politics, the industrial revolution, highly-advanced science and
technology, overwhelming knowledge, awesome communication possibilities, but all
topped off with grief, plagues, horrors, evil and certain self-destruction
because the Creator has either been eradicated from mainstream life, or pushed
into corners of society and there degraded into a variety of persons or
"somethings" that He is not.
Mayer Bauer changed the name to "Rothschild"
(meaning "red shield") for a reason not generally known. Yes, he had hung a
red-shield sign/symbol above the door of his shop while still a poor/common
family man, but what did it mean? Apparently, the protection and/or advancement
of something red...and I don't think it had anything to do with red potatoes.
Probably a red people. It just so happens that he was an Ashkenazi Jew, and that
Ashkenaz was a region in Magog where the so-called "red Jews" of Khazaria had
ruled an empire on the north shores of the Black and Caspian seas. Several
voices are now proclaiming that the Rothschilds, and most other Ashkenazi Jews,
are descended from the Khazars.
While the Jews of Khazaria had been the small
minority among both Christian and Muslim citizens, they ruled the empire
absolutely; it had been the law of the land that only Jews could rule! There
were two kings, an invisible one called a "khagan," and a visible one called a
"beg." Interesting, isn't it, that the invisible Rothschilds are now a few Jews
ruling the world.
In 867 AD, Vikings from Scandanavia, who called
themselves "Varangian Rus," appeared near Kiev (north shore of the Black Sea),
and eventually took the city from the Khazars. For some years the invaders lived
side by side with the Khazars, but thereafter they put the Khazars to flight, at
roughly which time the phrase, "Ashkenazi Jew," was heard for the first time in
the regions of Germany and Hungary. Arthur Koestler and some other researchers
believe that the ruling Khazars were not true Hebrews, but instead Turks who had
converted to Judaism. For this reason, Koestler and others suggest that the
Ashkenazi Jews--over 90 percent of those who claim to be Jews today--are Turks
who wrongly believe to be Jews. If Koestler is correct, then the conspiracy to
control the world by international bankers is not a Jewish plot, but a Turkish
plot. Or, Hitler sent mainly Turks to concentration camps! And Turks now run the
State of Israel!!
I disagree. As Koestler himself acknowledges,
there were some true Hebrews in Khazaria. Moreover, Ezekiel 38:8 speaks on the
1948 re-occupation of Israel by the "house of Israel" (Ezekiel 39:23). And there
are scores of prophecies elsewhere concerning the years just prior to Armageddon
in which the eternal restoration of Israel is the subject, and where the peoples
involved are unmistakably identified as the bloodline of
Jacob.
Koestler tells of a certain Khazar king named
"Joseph," who, although suspected of being a Hebrew by the Jews of western
Europe, claimed otherwise in a letter to them...claiming that his fathers were
descended from the seventh son of Togarmah, named "Khazar." Now Togarmah was a
son of Gomer, and Gomer was a son of Japheth (i.e. not Shem), wherefore it is
impossible for the Judaic rulers of Khazaria to have been Hebrews by blood if
they were descended from Togarmah. Koestler and others should perhaps entertain
the possibility that Joseph might have been lying to the European Jews in order
to protect himself, and all other Khazar Jews, from the sort of Vatican
persecution that the European Jews had been under, and would again and again be
inflicted with.
Note that after the second Vatican Crusade
against Jerusalem (1147-49), which was a Templar-led flop, some Jews of Khazaria
organized a Zionist movement of their own which also involved a siege of
Jerusalem (that never happened). Arthur Koestler puts in this
way:
"In the
twelfth century there arose in Khazaria a Messianic movement, a rudimentary
attempt at a Jewish crusade, aimed at the conquest of Palestine by force of
arms. The initiator of the movement was a Khazar Jew, one Solomon ben Duji (or
Ruhi or Roy), aided by his son Menahem and a Palestinian scribe. 'They wrote
letters to all the Jews, near and far, in all the lands around them...They said
that the time had come in which God would gather Israel, His people from all
lands to Jerusalem, the holy city, and that Solomon Ben Duji was Elijah, and his
son the Messiah'"
(http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/13trib04.htm)
Clearly, this Khazar-Jew Zionism was an attempt
to set the stage for the Biblical Millennium (would Turks have gone to these
lengths?). I have sought any evidence whatsoever to show whether or not Solomon
ben Duji had been connected to the Templars/Crusaders and their brand of
Zionism. I can find nothing either way, even though his twelfth-century thrust
coincided with the second and/or third Crusades. What seems certain is that
Khazar Zionism was the very task picked up centuries later by the Bauers, who,
as the House of Rothschild, would eventually succeed in creating an official
Jewish nation around Jerusalem, but not until 1948.
Note that, in Ezekiel 38:8, God does not take
credit for the 1948 re-instatement of Jews in the land of Israel, because, in my
opinion, God merely had to withdraw His hand, at the appointed time, to allow
his Jewish enemies to succeed in their flesh-powered brand of Zionism. These
Jews were not relying on God, nor waiting on Him, but were bankers, lovers of
money, and desirous of grand political power. Mayer Rothschild (the first
Rothschild) was himself a banker who had wormed his way into the affairs of one
of the wealthiest men of Europe, prince William of Hesse-Hanau. William's
brother (Karl) was a leader in European Freemasonry.
Almost certainly, as is claimed by others, the
Bavarian Illuminati grew out of the Enlightenment movement...and because the
Rothschilds were overseers of the Bavarian Illuminati, its outgrowth became the
Rothschild Illuminati as per the Rothschild rags-to-riches events. This is an
important point, for the Rothschild Illuminati, being a Jew-based organization,
could not be an integral part of the Rosicrucian Ros(e) Line if that Line was
Aryan/Norse. In fact, we'd expect the two Illuminati to be in mortal conflict,
and indeed we do see them at war in the 20th century wherein the Nazis--who were
an "Aryan" branch of Theosophist Rosicrucians, and were moreover supported by
the Hesse royal family--were persecuting the Rothschilds
internationally.
On the one hand, the Rosicrucians are those
whom I feel wish to place a Rose-Line member on the future throne of the world,
while on the other hand one can expect the modern Rothschilds to be seeking a
certain Rothschild for the world throne (keep in mind that not all Rothschilds
are known by that name). Where the Rothschilds formed alliances with
Rosicrucians, the Rothschilds desire(d) a Jewish-controlled Palestine at the
helm of the New World, while the pro-Rothschilds Rosicrucians want(ed) Britain
and/or America to act as the "New Israel." It is a testimony to the partnerships
developed by these two groups, I think, that the Rothschilds came to respect and
perhaps embrace the Anglo-based "Israel" while the Rosicrucians came to
tolerate, if not support, Zionism.
Because I concluded from my personal analysis
of Revelation 13 that the False Prophet will be an American leader, I tend to
expect the False Prophet to come from the Rosicrucian camp rather than the
Rothschild camp. Yet who knows but that the two horns which symbolize the False
Prophet may not prove to be a union between American and British Rosicrucians,
or perhaps a union between the Rosicrucians and the
Rothschilds.
No sooner after the French Revolution had the
House of Rothschild become the wealthiest family in Europe that, in 1822, the
hexagram (six-pointed star) was incorporated upon the Rothschild coat of arms,
the same star that is sported by the modern Rosicrucians and the State of
Israel! It is believed by some researchers that this "Star of David" (also
called "Shield of David" and "Seal of Solomon") was not a symbol relating to
either the Biblical King David or Solomon, but to Solomon ben Duji the Khazar,
and his son, David al-Roy. Read this from Arthur
Koestler:
"David
al-Roy was assassinated - apparently in his sleep, allegedly by his own
father-in-law...But the cult did not stop there. According to one theory, the
six-pointed "shield of David," which adorns the modern Israeli flag, started to
become a national symbol with David al-Roy's crusade. 'Ever since,' writes
Baron, 'it has been suggested, the six-cornered "shield of David", theretofore
mainly a decorative motif or a magical emblem, began its career toward becoming
the chief national-religious symbol of Judaism...it was attributed to David in
mystic and ethical German writings from the thirteenth century on, and appeared
on the Jewish flag in Prague in 1527.' Baron appends a qualifying note to this
passage, pointing out that the connection between al-Roy and the six-pointed
star still awaits further elucidation and proof."
I'm convinced! And as the hexagram was called
the "Shield of David," we may suspect that it had everything to do with Mayer
Bauer naming himself "Red Shield"? Even prior to the birth of Mayer, the
Shield-of-David star was in fact red when used as a logo by Jewish printers in
Prague (as early as the 15th century).
The modern Israeli equivalent to the
International Red Cross is called "Red Shield of David, UK" (Hebrew: "Magen
David Adom, UK"), and was initially founded in "a
shop on the corner of Rothschild and Nahalat Benyamin Streets [Tel Aviv 1930]"
(http://www.ukmda.org/history.html). The organization, as can be deduced
by the "UK" in its name, was founded in Britain...surely the British Rothschilds
had everything to do with this organization's inception...to have certain
controls over the blood supply of Israel, perhaps?
The Magen David website tells us that the
hexagram "was used by Jews for decoration and
appeared as an official Jewish symbol for the first time in 1354 when the Jewish
community in Prague [Germany] received the right to have a flag of its own and
chose the Shield of David..." "Decoration" my foot. It was a symbol used
to spur or maintain the ideals of Zionism and/or Israelite Millennialism in the
minds of Ashkenazi Jews. Because the House of Rothschild has ultimately brought
the State of Israel into existence, we could view the Israeli flag today as a
Rothschild flag, even a Khazar flag...and possibly a Rosicrucian
flag.
How do the Rosicrucians and the Rothschilds
both use the hexagram as their symbols? The theory is that a certain Richard
Bauer had found a means to convert lead or mercury to gold in the process of
alchemy. Whether this fantastic discovery is true or not is not the point, but
rather that this Bauer was likely an early Rosicrucian because Rosicrucians
would thereafter come to have alchemy as one of their main insignia. The other
point is that the Rothschilds had been Bauers so that if per chance Richard
Bauer was an ancestor of the Rothschilds, then the Rothschilds stem from Jewish
Rosicrucians. That would explain the Kabala being yet another Rosicrucian
insignia in some Rosicrucian circles. Later we will see that the Khazars (i.e.
the non-Jews) were themselves Aryans so that a Jewish-Aryan partnership was the
result when the Jews came to rule over Khazaria.
Could the essence of early Rosicrucianism have
been a Jewish-Aryan alliance? That is, an alliance between Marano Jews (also
called "neo-Christians") and Aryans? The Maranos were persecuted violently by
the Inquisition, after all, and the anti-Vatican position of the Rosicrucians
could thereby be partially explained. Many Aryan peoples had been a sort of
Marano people too, as they had "converted" to Catholicism, not sincerely, but by
force of Vatican armies. For an excellent example of a Jewish-Anglo partnership
involving the Rothschilds, note that the first Rothschild, Mayer, "was appointed financial agent of the British government
during the French revolutionary wars"
(http://encarta.msn.com/text_761576222__1/Rothschild_House_of.html).
The Marano Jews were set free from Vatican
persecution as a direct result of the French Revolution, and one wonders if this
war wasn't waged by the Rothschild Illuminati for that very reason. The
Rothschilds became the head of these Jews thereafter. For example, during the
Revolution, the Consistoire Central of French Israelis was formed (1791) to
represent and advance Jewish issues, with French Rothschilds acting as
Presidents for multiple generations.
At Edinburgh (very near Roslin) there was built
the palace, Holyrood House, which may mean, "House of the Haly Red" (early
records read as "Halyrod," not "Holyrood"). The official line is that "Holyrood"
means "holy rod" and refers to the cross of Christ. In what sounds like a tale,
it is said that Margaret brought from Hungary to Scotland a piece of the actual
cross of Christ; that sounds like a typical cover up to keep Christian rulers
happily unsuspecting of a reality. As "rood" means "red" in Dutch, and also
because it's similar to "rud," where "ruddy" refers to a red tinge, perhaps
"Holyrood House" refers to a red entity, or even a red
bloodline.
The Russell (also meaning "red") clan of
Scotland was originally a Jewish family from Germany, known then as the
"Roesels," alternatively "Rosel" and "Rossel." One can hardly fail to see the
"Rus" in "Russell" or the "Ros" in "Rosel," evoking the proto-Russians. But
knowing that "el" means "God" in Hebrew, the name seems to mean either "the Ros
of God" or "the Red of God." Then again, perhaps it means the "Red God." It's so
very interesting that a great leader of the Varangian Rus, Vladimir I, conquered
a red land (Galicia), that came to be known as "Red Rus," and that he was called
"Vladimir the Red Sun." That's equivalent to calling him the "Red God." But the
Varangians were Aryans, if not Anglo-Aryans ("Varangian" could mean "Warring
Anglos" because "var" means "war"), and that doesn't fit a red bloodline. But as
"hali" means "salt," perhaps "Halyrod" refers to a white
bloodline.
When I first began to suspect the Russell
bloodline as having some significance in the Rose-Line cult, I did not know that
the Skull and Bones club in the United States was incorporated as the Russell
Trust Fund (1856). But in that case, what others are saying, that a certain
Russell family is one of the top thirteen Illuminati families today, may just be
true.
I suspect that pastor Charles Russell, founder
of the Zion Tract Society (and root of the Jehovah's-Witnesses cult), had been
working more closely with the British Rothschilds than the world was supposed to
know. He worked openly in support of Zionism when the British and French
Rothschilds were spearheading the re-settlement of Jews in the Holy Land. He was
quite successful in motivating Jews to resettle because he did not attempt to
convert them to Christ...a strategy that the Rothschilds would have favored. In
1914, as his part in Rothschild Zionism, Russell announced that God would bless
all Jews who would thenceforth return to the Holy Land.
It is too difficult for me to see as a
coincidence Russell's prediction of Armageddon and the return of Jesus for 1914,
the very year that turned out to be the first of World War I, as though Russell
knew it beforehand. Britannica put it this way: From
1877 he preached that Christ's second advent would be invisible, that the end of
the Gentile times would come in 1914, followed by war between capitalism and
communism or socialism, after which God's Kingdom by Christ would rule the whole
earth" (1970; Vol. 19, page 770).
While the phrase above, "communism or
socialism," would seem to refer to Communist Russia, that entity was not yet
born when Russell was making the prediction. Because the Rothschilds, from the
1880s onwards, were bringing the socialist Fabian societies to fruition, the
Americans were perhaps supposed to have lost the war for the Allies so that,
after the War, Russia under the Fabian societies could arise as world rulers.
Frightening thought.
Because the Rothschilds are implicated in the
installation into power in Russia of the so-called "Red Jews," during the War
(1917), and also due to the fact that a global government (i.e. the League of
Nations) was being desperately sought by the Rothschilds, using the War as a
reason for its need, I and many others suspect strongly that the international
Rothschilds started the War itself, and manipulated the events toward their
goals as much as they could. A study of that War, with the end-goal of
conquering Russia in mind, brings out the following conclusions: that the German
Rothschilds fomented the war for a generation previous to 1914 through German
media outlets; that the English Rothschilds, in support of the German
Rothschilds, permitted only as many English soldiers onto the Belgium-French
scene as were needed to check/stalemate the German advance into France but not
to defeat it until the Germans had defeated Russia; that the English Rothschilds
through their agents Woodrow Wilson and his ambassador, Edward House, kept the
Americans out of the war until (April 1917) after the Bolsheviks had seized the
Russian reigns of rule by a coup (Mar. 1917); that the Germans, even though they
had defeated the Russian military by the autumn of 1917, and therefore should
have, and could have, taken the country, instead decided on a peace treaty (Dec.
1917) with the Rothschild agents (i.e. the Bolsheviks) then in power; and that
German Rothschilds together with the British Rothschilds began putting an end to
the war immediately after the peace treaty by setting German public opinion
against war on the one hand, and on the other hand by suddenly turning the
western Allies, until then a lame lot, into a powerhouse that easily repelled
the Germans into a steady retreat until they gave up in defeat (late
1918).
Now the English were a lame lot for the first
three years and more of the War; Britannica says that they could have halted the
German advance quickly in the Belgium-French arena had they come out all at once
with most of their forces, and yet they came in dribs and drabs. Therefore,
there was a stalemate on that front for three years that meanwhile permitted the
Germans to the east of it to work their will on Russia. But while the English
appeared as though they couldn't afford men in Belgium or France, how is it that
they had men to spare for the purpose of conquering both Jerusalem and Babylon,
including Baghdad? It's clear in my mind that the Middle East was as much the
Rothschild target as was Russia, for the two went hand in hand in their
global-government scheme.
Behold, in November of 1917, as the Russian
Rothschilds were on the verge of signing a peace treaty with the Germans, the
British Foreign Secretary, a Fabian co-conspirator, and occult-loving buddy of
the Rothschilds, Arthur Balfour, writes a letter to Lord Lionel Rothschild
asking him to accept his Declaration wherein the Jews could be re-instated into
their ancient homeland. In the very next month, the English conquer Jerusalem.
Then, just after the War, the Rothschilds set up a Foreign Affairs office in
Britain and in the United States, with more to come in other nations, and filled
them with Illuminatists under their care and watch...having the job of
ratcheting the governments of the world into submission to the Rothschild plan
for Globalism. So, you see, the restoration of the Jews to the Holy Land is part
and parcel with the establishment of the Rothschild New World Order...because
that New Order is intended to be the Biblical Millennium as per a
Jewish-occult vision.
Winston Churchill was lord of the British
admiralty when the first World War started. Just days before the War began, he,
"on his own responsibility, ordered the naval
mobilizations which guaranteed complete readiness when war was declared,"
and, "In Oct. 1914, when Antwerp was falling,
he characteristically rushed in person to organize its defense..."
(Britannica, 1970, Vol. 5, page 748). This zeal on behalf of Britain and against
the Germans was not conducive to the will of the Rothschilds, wherefore, behold,
Churchill was soon replaced as lord of the admiralty (May 1915) by the good
buddy of the Rothschilds, Arthur Balfour! So, you see, the Rothschilds had not a
few political puppets in the Parliament to make things work their
way.
It seems that the entire 1914-scheme started
rolling its wheels in the 1880s, for it was at about that time also that the
Rothschilds began to settle Russian Jews into the Holy Land. And see here what
the American Hebrew Magazine said just after the War:
"The
Bolshevist revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish
dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a new order of the
world" (Sept. 10, 1920)
Many other Jewish and non-Jewish sources
agreed. In the same year (1920), Winston Churchill wrote the following in the
Illustrated Sunday Herald:
"From the
days of SPARTICUS (Adam Weishaupt) to Karl Marx, to those of Trotsky, Bela-Kuhn,
Rose Luxembourg, and Emma Goldman, this [Jewish/Rothschild] world-wide
conspiracy has been STEADILY growing. This conspiracy has played a definitively
recognizable role in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the
mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century; and now at
last, this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great
cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of
their heads, and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous
empire"
(Quoted from The Missing Dimension in World Affairs, Goy, p.
92).
Clearly, Churchill was, at least initially,
opposed to the Rothschild Illuminati. In the above list of Jewish names, we see
Adam Weishaupt, the official founder of the Bavarian Illuminati (1776) while
under the oversight of Mayer Rothschild. Modern socialism was evident in the
mind of Weishaupt, and who knows but that it was perhaps patterned after
Jewish-ruled Khazaria. We find Weishaupt's socialism a generation after him in
another German Jew, Karl Marx, who, as an apostate, became as Satanic as was
Weishaupt. Marx, too, was financed by the Rothschilds.
From his training in France and England, Marx
developed his "personal" Communistic ideals and wrote the Communist Manifesto,
although we can estimate quite rightly that these ideas, in reality based on
dictatorial rule that no one wanted, were "refined" for public
dissemination. The following letter by Baruch Levy, to Marx, reflects
Weishaupt's dictatorial socialism in a Zionistic format:
"The
Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion
by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the
annihilation of monarchy, and by the establishment of a world republic in which
the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this "new
world order" the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without
encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the
world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will
then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and
everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of
the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come,
the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands"
(from `La Revue de Paris', p. 574, June 1, 1928,
http://beta.communities.msn.ca/UndergroundOracleII).
But let's go back prior to Marx, and prior even
to the Bavarian Illuminati, to see the deeper root of this movement. Frederick
II, king of Prussia (died 1786), while confessing Catholicism publicly, was an
atheist to his close associates, and moreover was a so-called "Illuminated
Despot," meaning that he ruled by Age-of-Enlightenment philosophies that had
flowed from Rosicrucian movements. Britannica says that "He made the Prussia of his day a model state of 'enlightenment
despotism'" (1970: Vol. 9; page 831). The object of this form of
government was, not to benefit the peoples' lot in life; as is often claimed in
an effort to honor the movement, but to better the people's lot in life so that
they could raise more money and thereby provide more taxes. It's the same system
that we live under to this day: capitalism.
Frederick was a friend of Voltaire, the
principal leader of the Enlightenment, who himself promoted Illuminated
Despotism in France, and whose goal it was to undermine the powers of monarchs
and Christianity. Frederick was influenced by Voltaire when the latter lived in
Prussia (1751) at Frederick's invitation. It should also be said that Voltaire
was staying in Frankfurt in 1753, where he was arrested by Frederick. Mayer, who
lived in Frankfurt, was just nine years old at the time, but, the question is,
what effect did Voltaire have on the Jews of Frankfurt that Mayer could later
pick up and run with?
Indeed, it's a good question, for it is said by
some that the Bavarian Illuminati copied from Voltaire. That seems likely, as
the principles of Enlightened Despotism--representative government, liberalism,
humanism, toleration of religion, and freedom of the press--were the same
principles forced upon France by the Bavarian/Rothschild Illuminati during the
French Revolution (1789 and onward)...and are obviously the very principles in
our midst today in most of the Western world. I would venture to say that these
principles represent the backbone of Mystery Babylon (the so-called "Harlot" of
Revelation 17). At the website of the "Voltaire Society of America," we
read:
The chief
purpose of THE VOLTAIRE SOCIETY OF AMERICA INCORPORATED is to foster the spirit
of the Enlightenment, tolerance and respect for the rights of the individual as
exemplified by the life of Voltaire and as reflected in the beliefs of his
contemporaries, the founders of the United States.
Our projects now
include the presentation of lectures and the creation of educational materials
such as a video on Voltaire and Jefferson...
(http://humanities.uchicago.edu/homes/VSA/)
That's Thomas Jefferson that is being placed side-by-side with
Voltaire, and I've read that Jefferson was a supporter of Adam Weishaupt. It is
no secret that the principles that were established in France under the
Illuminati fist were virtually the self-same that found establishment in the
United States.
I found an interesting Christian personality on an internet
site, with no name provided. While answering questions, he answered thus:
"Well, you are talking to an Ex-Illuminatist
who knows that there is no such thing [as the Communist party being the greatest
threat in the world]! Anybody coming out of the Illuminati will tell you that
the Communist Party is run by Illuminatists. NOT COMMUNISTS!!!...Now if you go
to the British Museum you will find two checks for several thousand pounds made
out to Carl Marx, and signed by Nathan Rothschild!"
I don't know if this ex-Illuminatist is a post-tribber, but, to
the question, "what are Christians expected to do?", he did say the
following:
"Pray! I'll tell you this. The only
thing the Illuminati fears as I said is an independent person who can live, eat,
sleep, stay warm and defend themselves separate from Federal help. Pray that the
Lord gives us more time! It is short (close)! See, they have tried twice before.
They have never been this organized. They have tried twice before in a span of
200 years to RULE the WORLD and came VERY CLOSE! Once during Napoleon and once
during WW 1. They came EXTREMELY close to gaining the world both times!"
(http://www.textfiles.com/occult/jtc4.txt)
If I
might use one of my Lord's favorite lines, "Those who have ears, let them hear."
Because some members of Charles Russell's family had been
proclaiming him to be someone very special in the eyes of God, chosen from
birth, who knows but that this is indication that Illuminatists had been
planning to use a Russell at the helm of their New World Order. Russell had
denounced all denominations but his own, and had called his organization
"International Bible Students Association," as though anticipating a
global teaching career in which he would become renown as the spiritual
giant of the world. In fact, he claimed to be an angel in the book of
Revelation. Charles was a nutty pyramidologist, and a Freemason, if that tells
you how qualified he was to be an Illuminatist.
The following quotes begin to show that the Rossels were in
Britain in the early Templar period, and that they were associated with the
Normans, as had been the Templars/Crusaders:
The surname "Russell" began to appear in
Irish records after the Anglo-Norman invasion [1066] and is now numerous in
Ulster and Leinster. It is derived from an old French word denoting a red-haired
person and is also an anglicized form of the French Protestant surname, Rossel
(http://russell.family-history.com/OriginofSurname.htm).
I don't take the "red-hair" meaning of "Russell" too seriously,
and the French origin of the name is in dispute against an alternative Norman
view:
[Russell] is probably derived from
"rous" meaning red and early bearers of the name no doubt had red hair - and
were probably of Norman or French extraction. While the name is by no means
confined to Scotland, it is within the top 50 most frequently found names in the
country...The name is one of the earliest surnames recorded in Scotland, the
first being a Walter Russell who witnessed a charter in Paisley Abbey some time
between 1164 and 1177" (http://www.rampantscotland.com/clans/blclanrussell.htm).
After recognizing the distinct possibility of modern Russells
having an important Illuminati role, I was shocked upon learning that one of the
original nine Templars was named, "Rossal." And behold, for years, the Chairman
of the Rosslyn Chapel Restoration Committee has been an Andrew Russell.
Coincidence? Or might "Roslin" itself have been named after the Rossals?
The Templar known by the name of "Rossal" may very well have
come to Scotland with Hugh de Payen (1128), for I read in some cases that all
nine Templars returned west, from Jerusalem, when Hugh returned. In fact, Rossal
may have been from Scotland in the first place, for, as early as the 1200s,
there was in northwest Scotland (i.e. in the Highlands) the village of
Rossal.
There was both a Ross clan and a Rose clan in early Scotland.
Therefore, either the Rossels/Rossals could have been related to either one. The
Ross and Rose clans were also in the Highlands; "Rose" is pronounced
"Ross."
In the next few chapters, I will go a long route to show that
the Rosicrucians descend from the Roxolani, where the "Rox" is a variation of
"Ros," and where the suffix, "olani," refers to the Alan Huns, a peoples
descended from the Biblical Gogi. In other words, the Roxolani were a mix of
Rosh and Gogi blood. It was only after coming to this conclusion that I noticed
the similarity between "Roxolani" (alternative "Ros-Alani") and "Roslin,"
especially "Rosalin." Thus, while "Rose Line" may be derived from "Roslin," the
latter may be derived from the Roxolani.
It must be said that the Stewarts, or Stuarts, who provided
many British kings, now wish to place a Stewart descendant at the head of the
European Union. In fact, the controversial book, Bloodline of the Holy Grail, in
which we find the theory of the Rose Line, promotes this modern Stewart quest to
rule. The question is, how do the Stewarts have anything to do with the Rose
Line?
My story in the next few chapters also touches on the Drummonds
and other Highland clans who vehemently supported the Stuart kings. Moreover,
you will see that the Drummonds are related by blood to the Rosses in a way that
you could never guess, and you will be invited to consider that "Ross" is not a
proper name, even as "Stewart" is not a proper name, but that "Ross" was devised
to represent the Ros(e) Line of the Drummonds. Because "Stewart" was devised
from "steward," the Stewarts may have been the stewards of the Ros(e)
Line.
Walter fitz Alan's descendant, another Walter, married the
daughter of Robert Bruce I, and together they had a daughter who married Robert
II. Thus, Robert II was the first Stewart king. The Robert Bruces (there were
several of them prior to Robert I) not only served the Norman and Viking rulers,
but had married St. Clairs and were thereby descendants of the Rollo Vikings.
It's not too hard to spot the "Rus" in Brus, Brussi, or Brusse, the proper
spellings of "Bruce," but this is not to say that there is definitely a
connection.
It's interesting that Alan fitz Flaald, the father of Walter
fitz Alan (above), was Seneschal of the archbishop of Dol in Brittany (his
ancestors were Seneschals to the counts of Dol). "Seneschal" means "High
Protector," and is synonymous with "High Steward." What on earth was that family
protecting and managing in Brittany (modern France) prior to doing the same in
the Scottish royal courts? Did it have anything to do with protecting a
bloodline in Brittany. I note that the brother of Alan fitz Flaald, also Alan,
went on the first Crusade to Jerusalem.
There are those who would want you to believe that the Stewarts
descend from the Merovingians, the Fisher kings...and all the way back to Jesus
and his mistress. Obviously, this little tale was fabricated to hide the real
roots of the Seneschals.
The Ross clan was early "de Ros," and, prior to being in the
Highlands, the family was situated on the west coast of Scotland due west of
Roslin, in Ayrshire. The Stewarts were right next door. But so were the
Drummonds, at Drymen!! [Update July 20006 -- I had traced the Druids to the
mythical Dryas.] The Rose clan was also there, in submission to the Rosses. When
the Rosses moved north to Ross-Shire, they lived in the midst of the Roses
there, and mingled blood. It was discovered that the Roses had similarities to
the Roos family in England, and of course "Roos" evokes "Rus."
HOME TO THE
BOOK
NEXT CHAPTER Henry
Drummond the
Hun
|
(私論．私見)